# Infobip — API Agent Score

> Score: 74/100 (Grade: B) | Domain: infobip.com | Rubric: 1.0.0 | Checked: July 24, 2026

Infobip scored 74/100 (B), classified "partially-ready".

[View full report](https://www.postman.com/ai/ai-ready-apis/company/infobip)
[All organizations](https://www.postman.com/ai/ai-ready-apis/llms.txt)

## Summary

- Overall: 74/100 (B)
- Classification: partially-ready

## Category Scores

- API Design: 89/100 (A)
- Developer Experience: 75/100 (B)
- Agent Discovery: 85/100 (A)
- Agent Understanding: 78/100 (B)
- Agent Usability: 51/100 (D)

## Check Results

### API Design

- [pass] Auth declared & discoverable — authentication documented in the docs site at https://www.infobip.com/authentication. Investigated: docs 100%, spec 50%, wellknown 0%.
- [warn] Schema coverage & depth — 35/62 (56%) public params are fully typed (no any/**kwargs). Analyzer reports not all methods have a derivable input schema. Investigated: sdk 76%, spec 67%.
- [warn] Machine-readable, versioned contract — info.version="3.210.0" set but no versioning scheme (URL / header / media type) detected. Investigated: spec 75%, docs 50%.
- [pass] Security & governance hygiene — No credential-shaped strings detected in spec. Investigated: spec 100%, wellknown 100%.
- [pass] Example coverage — 87% example coverage across params + responses. Investigated: spec 100%, sdk 100%, docs 0%.

### Developer Experience

- [pass] Self-service developer portal — Signup page at https://www.infobip.com/signup; no free-tier language detected in docs/pricing. Investigated: docs 100%.
- [pass] Description completeness — 89% description completeness (target 90%+). Investigated: spec 100%, sdk 37%.
- [pass] Changelog published — changelog documented in the docs site at https://www.infobip.com/docs/release-notes. Investigated: spec 100%, docs 100%, sdk 100%.
- [warn] Quickstart present — Quickstart page reachable (12 variants scanned starting at https://www.infobip.com/docs/api/quickstart) but no runnable code sample detected in HTML or .md variant. Investigated: docs 50%.
- [fail] Code samples in docs — No detectable code samples across 19 sampled docs pages. Investigated: docs 0%.

### Agent Discovery

- [pass] Registry & SDK presence — Indexed on Context7 (websites/infobip, 23317 snippets). Investigated: docs 100%, sdk 100%, mcp 100%, cli 0%, wellknown 0%.
- [warn] llms.txt present, valid & comprehensive — No llms.txt directive found in HTML of any of 35 pages. Investigated: docs 86%, sdk 0%.
- [warn] Docs reachable, not hard auth-gated — 35 of 35 pages return 200 for non-existent URLs (soft 404). Investigated: docs 75%.
- [warn] Crawlable / AEO — robots.txt blocks 6 of 7 monitored AI crawlers on docs paths (gptbot, claudebot, claude-web, anthropic-ai, google-extended, ccbot). Investigated: wellknown 50%.

### Agent Understanding

- [pass] Machine-readable errors (RFC 9457) — 11 distinct 4xx/5xx response codes documented. Investigated: docs 100%, spec 50%.
- [pass] Operation purpose clarity — 95% of operations have a clear summary + operationId an agent can select on. Investigated: spec 100%.
- [warn] Agent-navigable, token-efficient docs — 35 of 35 pages have content starting past 50% (worst 100%). Investigated: docs 90%.
- [warn] Description consistency across surfaces — Mean pairwise description similarity across 3 surfaces (spec, docs, sdk) is 5% (threshold 35% for full credit).
- [fail] Agent instructions file (AGENTS.md) — No AGENTS.md at the site root or /.well-known/. Investigated: wellknown 0%.
- [fail] Docs structured data — Neither JSON-LD nor OpenGraph/meta tags detected across 3 assessed pages (3 JS-rendered). Investigated: docs 0%.

### Agent Usability

- [pass] Pagination documented & consistent — Pagination params detected on 138 list endpoint(s). Investigated: spec 100%, docs 100%.
- [warn] Sandbox separation — No test-mode flag or sandbox environment is exposed. Investigated: sdk 50%, spec 0%, docs 0%.
- [fail] Idempotency documented — 0% of mutating operations document idempotency. Investigated: spec 0%, docs 0%, sdk 0%.
- [fail] Rate-limit signaling — No rate-limit response headers documented. Investigated: spec 0%, docs 0%.
- [fail] Runnable collection with test scripts — No public Postman workspace discovered for the org. Investigated: platform 0%.

## Executive Summary

Infobip's API program excels in discovery and machine-readable contract quality, giving partners a strong foundation to find and evaluate the APIs. However, the program has critical gaps in agent usability and agent understanding: there is no runnable context for agents to build against, no instructions file to orient AI coding tools, and operational reliability signals like idempotency and rate-limit behavior are underdocumented. Closing these gaps should be the immediate priority — without them, partner integrations stall and AI agents hallucinate rather than execute.